• Guest, Help The DPF Community Thrive - Join Our Donation Drive Today!

    We're launching a special DPF Donation Drive to ensure our beloved forum continues to flourish. Your support is vital in helping us cover essential server costs and keep our community running smoothly — This is more than just a donation; it's an investment in the future of our community.

    Join us in this crucial drive and let's ensure our forum remains a vibrant and dynamic place for everyone.

    Please visit the DPF Donation Drive Thread for details and instructions on how you can make your donation today!

iTrader ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
iTrader ?

disneyfreak619

New DPF Member
Rating - 100%
41   0   0
Messages
476
Location
San Diego CA
When you go to iTrader and on the right it has Recent Ratings and like right now I see 5 negative feedbacks in the last 6 months and 7 neutrals in the last 6 months how do I know who those negatives and neutrals were left for ?
 
Keep track of the people you trade with. I don't think you can check and see, and odds are it will always end up being a fight. Not worth it.
 
I'm one of the negatives. *shrugs a bit helplessly* Hopefully it will be taken care of soon. Negative feedback doesn't always get left fairly, and I'd look at the other trades that the person's made. With our community, there's little reason for negative to be left unless someone actually disappears with the money and never comes back.
 
Last edited:
With our community, there's little reason for negative to be left unless someone actually disappears with the money and never comes back.
I think that's a little simplistic. If someone fails to follow through on an agreement to trade and receives their part of the deal without returning anything and then refusing to communicate on the issue, then yes, negative feedback is called for, and if this behaviour becomes a habit, there should be more done than just feedback because not everyone bothers to check the feedback, or even knows how when they first get here. If some are allowed to continue this habit of taking without giving, why should they be allowed to continue with such behaviour. I'd actually like to see something like a "red flag" on their id or account after accumulating a certain number of negatives in a certain time period, just so that people could be forewarned, but this is likely something that isn't feasible, so checking feedback and leaving appropriate feedback is about the only thing that can be done. Being able to contact those who left the negative is also good to find out if it was resolved.
 
I think that's a little simplistic. If someone fails to follow through on an agreement to trade and receives their part of the deal without returning anything and then refusing to communicate on the issue, then yes, negative feedback is called for, and if this behaviour becomes a habit, there should be more done than just feedback because not everyone bothers to check the feedback, or even knows how when they first get here. If some are allowed to continue this habit of taking without giving, why should they be allowed to continue with such behaviour. I'd actually like to see something like a "red flag" on their id or account after accumulating a certain number of negatives in a certain time period, just so that people could be forewarned, but this is likely something that isn't feasible, so checking feedback and leaving appropriate feedback is about the only thing that can be done. Being able to contact those who left the negative is also good to find out if it was resolved.

Bumping a 1.5 year old thread?! Wow. Constance is a name I haven't seen in a long time (I hope she and Master Gracey are well!)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top