New filter in chat?
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone AKA If you've never said a bad word then fine step up and punish those who have been cursing in the chat room but if any of you have ever uttered a swear word then please keep your traps shut.
Sometimes if the right thing to do is the wrong thing and the hardest and we should really appreciate what people have to say but don't act like what it is. You know?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH2-TGUlwu4
I do not respect anyone who curses which includes all former presidents, MLK, Ghandi, all musicians, and basically anyone. I do not respect anyone.
When quotes and words from the past are taken out of the context of their time I don't think they carry the same meaning. If those people were alive today I just can't believe that they would be saying those words in relation to this topic. Nobody is restricting anyone's freedom of thought and there is nothing stopping anyone here from opening their own site where they can express themselves to their hearts content.
Why the torture link? As much fun as a lobotomy can be I really prefer the full manchurian candidate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSZV1zBBzVs
I see your Nyan Cat 2 and raise you a Pinky Pie saying Whoo for 15 minutes.
I see your ponies and raise u cute kitties
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
My quotes were not taken out of context. Justice Douglas' belief on freedomof speech is quite well known. The quote is quite reflective of his beliefs and perfectly appropriate in this context.
As for Ms. Blume, I think she would be quite surprise to have read that shewas dead.
You are right. This is a private site. It has the right to set the rules. However, unless I am mistaken, I believe that I have the right to express my displeasure with new rules that are summarily executed. As for this being a Disney pin trading site, so what? It has been recently stated by the moderators that they “want to promote open discussion as much as possible here on DPF, so if you encounter an issue with another member please work out your differences like adults.” Emphasis added via bold / underline. This would seem to indicate the primary audience of this forum would be adults. (Although I would concede the point that the rules state that anyone can create an account with activation for those under 13 needed to be done by an administrator) There are many topics (from mundane to the comical to profane) which have nothing to do with Disney or pin trading on this site.
The only rule regarding subject matter I can quickly find is this one: “By agreeingto these rules, you warrant that you will not post any messages that areobscene, vulgar, sexually-oriented, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.”
Hopefully without getting dragged into a horrible quagmire of legalese, mere fleeting expletives (at least not those on the airwaves) do not seem to violate this rule.
As for the concept of children, as they appear on this forum, I would simply invoke parental responsibility. It is a parent's responsibility to monitor their children; what one parent might find offensive may not be what I find offensive for my child.
kajtdd
[video=youtube;QwIphm5wVAs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwIphm5wVAs&NR=1&feature=fvwp[/video]
[video=youtube;MKzqP4-0Z6M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKzqP4-0Z6M[/video]
But he died when, 1975? Before the internet as we know it was even around. Times have changed and in the grand scheme of things this is a pretty trivial topic so, maybe he would agree, maybe he wouldn't. And just because he was a supreme court justice doesn't mean he was right. Our current supreme court has provided several examples of that. I just think we should solve the problems of our time the best we can. We can learn from the past, but shouldn't rely on it to do our thinking for us.
I would respectively disagree with these assertions. While you are correct, Justice Douglas died in the 1970s, his position was consistent on the rights on freedom of speech. It is hard to phantom an argument that Internet postings / chat are not “speech”. As for modern technology, just last week the Supreme Court struck down California’s law regarding restricting the sale violent video games to minorson free speech grounds. In the last 10 years, it has stuck down laws regarding outlawing simulated underage sex on the internet and crush videos on the internet. The Supreme Court has also ratified the right to engage in fairly offensive speech, such as wearing clothing in court that states “F*** the Draft” in 1971, flag burning in 1988, or picketing the funerals of fallen soldiers in 2011. These types of offensive speeches are protected. It is fairly consistent that barring a few (major) expectations (such as child pornography or national security issues such as troop locations during war time), prior restraint on free speech by governmental entities is not tolerated.^^
:shock:
Please Never post these jumping happy faces ever again! Hahahaha, they're so creepy!... *shudder*
And I agree with you, those videos were pretty funny!
Are we thinking of the children yet?
LOL!
I would .gif you, but it's late, and I am le lazy.
Now I'm sure I'm going to get slammed and I know I said I wasn't going to post anymore, but I feel I need to say something here. I feel this place is turning into another Dizpins type site. I hate being treated like a child.
to be honest, there's not enough chatroom traffic to warrant this. However, if we can ever afford to upgrade the service level of the chat software we have now, different "rooms" or "channels" are possible.Um... just a thought. Is there a way we can have 2 chat rooms? One for the "free speech, we don't care, we need to blow off some steam" people and one for the "I can't handle those type of words, my children think your disgusting" people?
Do not watch if you are offended by the word jacka$$ which technically is not a curse word. :drool:
http://www.illwillpress.com/scarfYT.html
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?