Q&A sessions with LANSAM and PinPics
Merryweather
Active DPF Member
- Messages
- 5,463
There are 2 sides to this:
1. Your garden variety scrapper sellers, and the ones I am referring to are located from north of east coast to south of east coast, those post the actual pictures of the pins. They actually post their own photos and they sell scrappers.
They probably do this for 2 reasons:
a. They do not want to get into trouble with Ebay for copyright violations
b. Showing the picture of the actual pin helps them to look "honest" and gives the newbie buyers a false sense of security
2. The scrapper sellers who pump out low LE pins, on the other hand, are really the ones who should provide actual pictures.
See this recent discussion about yet another Jes pin http://disneypinforum.com/showthread.php?11989-Jessica-as-the-Evil-Queen
If the seller puts the pic in post #14, which is the actual pic, he can't sell this pin. Instead, he uses stock photo from Pinpics which is actually the concept art from disneystore.com or odpt.com.
So, Lansam's intentions maybe good in this, but there are already scrapper sellers out there (for rack & hm pins) who use their own pics anyway.
I know Ebay's protection is good now, but it has only improved in the last 2-3 yrs or so. I have received a defective version of
. In the 2 years I have been collecting, I have seen this particular pin on Ebay only twice. The one that came to my home had a small hole in the enamel. The seller refunded me shipping both ways as well as the pin. But thinking that I found a rare pin finally and then getting a dud was hard on me :lol:
So, in conclusion, at least for me since I am shifting my collection from rack pins to LE 1000 and lower, actual pics are better.
1. Your garden variety scrapper sellers, and the ones I am referring to are located from north of east coast to south of east coast, those post the actual pictures of the pins. They actually post their own photos and they sell scrappers.
They probably do this for 2 reasons:
a. They do not want to get into trouble with Ebay for copyright violations
b. Showing the picture of the actual pin helps them to look "honest" and gives the newbie buyers a false sense of security
2. The scrapper sellers who pump out low LE pins, on the other hand, are really the ones who should provide actual pictures.
See this recent discussion about yet another Jes pin http://disneypinforum.com/showthread.php?11989-Jessica-as-the-Evil-Queen
If the seller puts the pic in post #14, which is the actual pic, he can't sell this pin. Instead, he uses stock photo from Pinpics which is actually the concept art from disneystore.com or odpt.com.
So, Lansam's intentions maybe good in this, but there are already scrapper sellers out there (for rack & hm pins) who use their own pics anyway.
I know Ebay's protection is good now, but it has only improved in the last 2-3 yrs or so. I have received a defective version of
So, in conclusion, at least for me since I am shifting my collection from rack pins to LE 1000 and lower, actual pics are better.
Last edited: